Accurate powder dispensing for chemistry and materials science applications

Hi @benjimaruyama, we own one solid dispensing solution and have tried several others. Here are my experiences:

Freeslate / Unchained (currently own)

Pros:

  • Good for small masses (as low as 0.5 mg), high precision (as good as +/-0.1 mg, easily <+/-0.5 mg).
  • SV system uses small disposable vials (4 ml) so you don’t need a lot of powder
  • Plastic SV caps are relatively cheap and don’t have artificial dispense number limits
  • Powdernium Classic can be used for larger masses
  • Near the top in terms of range of powders dispensed (50-70% of powders)
  • Can dispense into microplates or individual vials

Cons:

  • Slow. ~1 min/vial, or even slower when learning a new powder.
  • Not practical for large masses (>100 mg). Really optimized for the 1-10 mg scale.
  • Disposable plastic SV caps can break. If your robot has a service contract, sometimes Unchained will give you free replacements.
  • Hoppers have to be stored on the robot deck, which can take up a lot of space (esp. the large mass Classic hoppers).
  • Unchained robots are expensive, even at the low end (Junior)

Mettler Toledo Quantos (demo’d)

Pros:

  • Accurate dispensing. One of the best powder dispensers, but maybe not as accurate at the low end as Unchained. Precision varies a lot with powders, about +/- 0.3-1 mg, sometimes even 2-3 mg.
  • Generally very impressive hardware (hoppers) and powder range (near the top)
  • Can dispense larger masses than Unchained
  • Hoppers have RFID tags for identification and for remembering trainings

Cons:

  • Powder hoppers are expensive, larger than Unchained SV vials. Price per dispense is pretty high (see below)
  • Initially, powder hoppers were artificially limited to a set # of dispenses. Apparently things are better now and there are workarounds.
  • Cannot dispense into microplates. Mettler only offers a carousel multi vial changer.
  • (in Mettler form), have to manually change out hopper
  • You can contract with LabMan to integrate a Quantos with a multi-axis robot arm that can automatically change out powder hoppers and sample containers from a hotel (see A-Lab by Prof. Gerd. Ceder). Pricey.
  • Quantos price w/ autosampler is also quite high.

Chemspeed (demo’d and input from current users)

Pros:

  • Price can get significantly lower than Unchained, although still high
  • Negative gravimetric dispenser can move to vials/wells, saving time
  • Can dispense quite large volumes decently (100 mg - grams)
  • No dispense limits. Hopper heads are not disposable.

Cons:

  • Has trouble with a lot of powders – range of powders much lower than Unchained / Mettler
  • Cannot dispense low masses (mg), precision is worse than competitors
  • Hopper volumes are large (requiring lots of sample).
  • Dispense mechanism (screw or whisk) is not as advanced as Unchained/Mettler, prone to jamming, and can leak powder unintentionally.
  • If the gravimetric overhead dispenser misses the vial, recorded masses are inaccurate.
  • Software is pretty bad.
  • Generally, you have to optimize the dispense head and workflow for each powder, which is time consuming.
1 Like

@FrantzLD @aclasky and co., I believe your lab was working on some trickler-based solid dispensing inspired by OpenTrickler. Is any of that public? Would love to try it out over here in Utah if so.

I guess as a brief update, we’ve been having trouble dispensing stock materials for finer powders using the Autotrickler v4 (context). Also wanted to mention that MTI now has some automated powder dispensing modules (16 individual hoppers, a few dozen vials), about $50-60k I think. I was chatting with them at TMS 2026. I found it interesting they made the switch to vertical auger rather than horizontal due to issues they were having with fine particles.

Also pointing out on the same MTI page I came across following manual dispenser with a video, which is reminiscent of what @OwenMelville showed earlier.